Sunday, December 22, 2013

LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL'S RESOLUTION TO STOP ALL DEPORTATIONS




 Discover Current Events Internet Radio from The Justice Channel with Ernest Moore on     BlogTalkRadio

In the city of Los Angeles, illegal aliens are demanding to end all deportations because it breaks up their families.  The Los Angeles City Council has passed a resolution to demand that president Obama stop all deportations. 

Yet there is no mention at all of the American families that have been destroyed because an illegal alien has killed a member of their family.  

I recorded part of the presentations and speeches during the City Council meeting on this agenda item. I have posted a link to the audio in this article below.
Audio of the Los Angeles City Council Resolution to stop all deportations



I will post the video of this council meeting to this article after some editing. 



This is a video that I have published to the TJC YouTube channel about "The Day of Remembrance", that took place last October 2013 in Los Angeles, California for some of the families that have been torn apart by illegal aliens that have killed a family member. I hope to develop this project into a full documentary in the future. This is a low resolution format for evaluation of the video that I am producing. The ladies in this video give a detailed description of what happened to their loved one and how the illegal aliens that were responsible were not deported. These are just a few of the victims that gave there testimony that day. 

The push for immigration anarchy in the city of Los Angeles continues by our local government. I believe that it was started by the Bush administration and is designed to destroy this country! Foreigners that have come into this country legally and illegally are getting preferential treatment from our local and federal government. Especially the illegal alien Hispanics, who are allowed to get jobs in the public and private sectors and discriminate against American citizens in employment. They can get jobs in the police forces and even dominate LAPD and the Sheriff's department. Hispanics have taken over entire cities like the city of Bell.

There are illegal alien Hispanic gangs that are killing the innocent youth of Black Americans to force them out of their own country. This is well know by all law enforcement and the District Attorneys in southern California, yet they are not deported.

Friday, November 29, 2013

Elder Law Attorney Sued for Wrongful Death of His Father

This is another article submitted by our foreign correspondent Janet Phelan. We have been following the corruption in the California Probate Courts for years now. This is another installment to document the crimes that are handed down with impunity! --- Ernest L. Moore



Redlands Probate Attorney J. David Horspool has been sued for the wrongful death of his father, Raymond Horspool, who died under questionable circumstances in 2011.

After putting his father under a conservatorship in 2006, Horspool and sister Margaret Updike proceeded to take a number of actions which alarmed some of their siblings. Raymond was married and living with his wife, Winifred, when conservator Updike had him taken from his home while Winifred was out shopping.

In some states that would be called kidnapping. However, as Raymond was at that juncture a ward of his daughter, Margaret, the court overlooked this breach.

When son William Horspool became concerned that his father was subsequently being neglected, he took some photographs which allegedly showed Raymond Horspool lying in excrement soaked bedding. San Bernardino Probate Judge Michael Welch ordered the photographs destroyed and then issued a Restraining Order against William. In a brazen detour from due process, William Horspool was never granted a hearing on the Restraining order.

The wrongful death lawsuit, filed by Raymond Horspool’s daughter, Barbara Howard, names attorney Horspool, sister Margaret Updike, brother Raymond Horspool, Jr. and Integrated Care Community as defendants. The lawsuit alleges that due to the actions of the defendants, Raymond Horspool suffered malnutrition and starvation. The suit also alleges that J. David Horspool, Margaret Updike and Raymond Horspool, Jr refused to coordinate the replacement of the pacemaker for their father, instead letting it run down.

This reporter has obtained correspondence from cardiologist Dr. Malcolm Pond, dated February 25, 2011, in which he states that he checked the pacemaker in January of 2011 and that it was nearing the end of its charge. He then states that “Margaret has decided for Ray that it is inappropriate to proceed with pacemaker generator replacement...” He further states that “I respect Margaret's decision not to proceed with pacemaker generator replacement, and support this decision.”

The letter concludes with Dr. Pond stating that Barbara Howard and William Horspool have no say in this matter.

Raymond Horspool died shortly thereafter, on March 13, 2011.

The Riverside County Coroner's report concerning Raymond Horspool's demise increases concerns as to the nature and cause of the elderly man's death. Although noting that Raymond Horspool had been on Morphine and Ativan at the time of his death, the coroner refused to do a toxicology exam on the body, overriding the request by Barbara Howard. The potentiating affects of the mixture of these two drugs are known to cause respiratory failure. In addition, patients who are being given Morphine often decline to eat.

Howard maintains that her father's body weighed 137 pounds at time of death, a dramatic loss from his usual weight of around 200 pounds. Strangely, the Coroner failed to list the weight of the body in his report, a departure from generally accepted reporting requirements.

When asked why the report failed to contain mandatory body weight information, the Deputy Coroner became combative.

The battle over Raymond Horspool's assets predate his death. In 2003, prior to the initiation of the conservatorship, Raymond had deeded a piece of property to his son, William. J. David Horspool subsequently persuaded Judge Welch to revoke this grant deed. As a result of this revocation of ownership, William, a retired peace officer, his wife Kelly and three young children were evicted and rendered homeless.

In her objection to the First and Final Report of the Executor, Howard alleges that “It also appears from the court records Ms. Margaret Updike, J. David Horspool and Raymond P. Horspool, Jr. have caused serious and irreparable harm to the Estate of Raymond P. Horspool, Sr. “ Her objections state that “Several beneficiaries have tried without success to obtain the records of the ESTATE and the FAMILY TRUST. None of the following beneficiaries have been able to ascertain exactly what was ESTATE or FAMILY TRUST property. It has been impossible to determine what has happen[ed] to this property.”

Strangely, Raymond Horspool's Will was lost by the law offices of Horspool and Horspool, according to the court record.

Attorney J. David Horspool was for many years the attorney of record for conservator Melodie Scott. Scott has been linked to a number of deaths by morphine.

The wrongful death suit will be heard in Riverside Superior Court. Attorney J. David Horspool did not reply to calls from this reporter concerning the allegations contained in the lawsuit.

Janet Phelan
Activistpost.com
Elder Law Attorney Sued for Wrongful Death of His Father

Sunday, November 17, 2013

Is The U.S. Supreme Court In Contempt Of Black America?


Chief Justice John Roberts

            The U.S. Supreme court ruled on June 25, 2013 by a Writ of Certiorari to “invalidate” section 4 of the Voter Rights Act (VRA) of 1965. This section provides crucial protections for Black Americans against states that have a long history of promulgating racist obstructions to voting or running for office. Chief Justice John Roberts, delivered the Supreme Court’s opinion in the  SHELBY COUNTY, ALABAMA v. HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL, case. As stated in the Supreme Court Syllabus for this case:
 The Voting Rights Act of 1965 was enacted to address entrenched racial discrimination in voting, “an insidious and pervasive evil which had been perpetuated in certain parts of our country through unremitting and ingenious defiance of the Constitution.” South Carolina v. Kat­zenbach, 383 U. S. 301, 309. Section 2 of the Act, which bans any “standard, practice, or procedure” that “results in a denial or abridgement of the right of any citizen . . . to vote on account of race or color,” 42 U. S. C. §1973(a), applies nationwide, is permanent, and is not at issue in this case.


Article II Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, provides that the judicial Power of the united States , shall be vested in one supreme court. The supreme court has jurisdiction to interpret issues of the U.S. Constitution and statutes that Congress has enacted pursuant to its limited powers under the U.S. Constitution.
One can interpret the current actions of the U.S. Supreme Court by some of the current theories of Jurisprudence. I believe that our present U.S. Supreme court justices are operating under Legal Realism. “The proponents of Legal Realism assert that judges decide cases based on factors other than logic and preexisting rules, such as economic and sociological factors.” 
It is my opinion that their ruling is an example of an Evolutionary Approach to constitutional interpretation in which judges seek to determine the underlying, purpose that the drafters had in mind at the time they wrote the law and the modern-day option that best advances that purpose.

Voting fraud is rampant throughout this country. Even the presidential elections are nothing but a staged TV media show to make it look like we are living in a “free” country. Our leaders are not elected by the U.S. Citizenry but are selected by the 1%. These elections are just staged TV shows to make it look like American citizens are electing these unscrupulous politicians into office. It was very obvious that our last President George Walker Bush, was not duly elected as president in his first term or especially the second term. His “selection” into office was just another hostile take over by the Bush Family Regime and “Right Wing” Republicans. He even got the lone African American Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice, of the U.S. Supreme Court to authorize his election “selection” results that put Bush into office. His election was highly criticized for corruption and for obvious attempts to suppress Black American voter turnout.
The U.S. Supreme court does not have jurisdiction to decide the outcome of elections from the states for the American people. Associate Justice Clarence Thomas did not mention this fact and still has not even tried to do anything about it! This was obvious bias on partisan lines for Republicans by Clarence Thomas. Subsequently, the Supreme Court did nothing to oppose any of the criminal acts by the Bush Administration and has done nothing to end the voter fraud and voter manipulations that dominate our electoral process in this country.
As reported by the article published on the RT Website, “The regions covered by the part of the Act that was struck down, Section 4, have, in recent years, been twice as likely as those not covered to have proven violations under other sections of the Act,” wrote The New Yorker’s Amy Davidson.
George Walker Bush, just like his father George H. W. Bush, has conducted a campaign to “dismantle” the Civil Rights advancements that were gained for Black Americans by 1965. I feel that the executive branch of our government is using the Supreme Court in the Judicial Branch of our government to continue their degradation of Civil Rights for Black Americans that is guaranteed by our constitution.

The Supreme Court’s justification of their ruling states in essence, there is no problem because more blacks are voting than back in 1965 and there are more blacks in political office now than back in 1965.This seems to be some kind of “Judicial Propaganda” to me and does not reflect true statistics or reality. I do know that voter turn out in California for Black Americans is at an all time low because there are no viable candidates for Blacks to vote for. They say that there are more Blacks in office now than back in 1964. This is true, but these so-called African Americans in political office have no real substance and will not stand up for Black Americans at all! This can be seen by our current President Barack Obama, who will not even say “Black Americans” when he is running for office, has not mentioned any of the atrocities that have been committed against Black Americans by our judicial system and law enforcement agencies. Obama demonstrated during his campaign that he is committed to do more for Mexico and Mexicans than American citizens. That is why African Americans are worse off now than back in 1913!

The Supreme Court’s opinion also states that voter protections for Black Americans should be based on current conditions than what was prevalent back in 1965. It seems to me that this opinion of the constitution is keeping in the Evolutionary Approach of constitutional interpretational jurisprudence, in that they are trying to take current social issues into consideration as a basis for the  requirement that the federal government “preclear” states or local changes in election rules that could potentially prevent minorities from voting. If this were true, then they should be trying to add more protections for Black Americans for voter rights and to assure that viable Black American candidates run for office that will stand up of the rights of Black African Americans than to just take away all protections.

Monday, July 29, 2013

Analysis Of The "Stand Your Ground" Law In The State Of Florida



I have posted the Florida Statute of self-defense that contains the "Stand Your Ground" section after my analysis in this article. This was used for the defense of George Zimmerman, for the murder of Trayvon Martin. It is also being used as the "excuse" for the corruption and institutionalized racism of the Florida judicial system.

This law was reviewed by the judge in the Zimmerman trial and was found not to apply to Zimmerman! The judge could have thrown the case out before it came to trial if it did apply. The jury should have seen that Zimmerman is a low life killer and convicted him. That is the responsibility of a jury in a criminal case in this country. Using part of this law as an excuse to allow a murderer to go free is criminal!

If you look at section 3 of the Florida Statute you can see at least two points that would indicate that this section does not apply to George Zimmerman.

1.) Section 3  states that a person who is standing their ground must not be doing something illegal. George Zimmerman was "stalking" Trayvon Martin that night on private property.
2. George Zimmerman was obviously lying about his injuries and has no credibility!  The original pictures of George Zimmerman, that I saw on network TV showed clearly that he did not have cuts to his head or a broken nose when he came into the police station that night!

Racist "Right Wing" talk show hosts like the ones on KABC Talk Radio in Los Angeles, California and others are trying to shift the blame for this corrupt verdict to this law. We also see the African Democratic Caucus "Porch Monkeys" trying to shift the blame for this atrocity over to this section of the Florida law. This has nothing to do with this Blatant Institutionalized Racism of the Florida courts.

That verdict was the result of jury tampering by George Zimmerman's father and jury misconduct by that jury. Zimmerman and his defense lawyer should have criminal charges filed against them  for perjury!


The 2012 Florida Statutes


Title XLVI
CRIMES

Chapter 776 
JUSTIFIABLE USE OF FORCE

View Entire Chapter

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.
(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and
(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:
(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or
(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or
(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or
(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.

(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

(5) As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.
(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.
(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.




Listen to internet radio with Ernest Moore on BlogTalkRadio

Thursday, July 25, 2013

Zimmerman Verdict: The Revolts in Los Angeles, California

The corrupt verdict that was handed down from the Florida courts that let George Zimmerman go free after he killed Trayvon Martin, sparked revolts and demonstrations all over this country. I came out with my cameras to document the demonstrations that were going on in Los Angeles, California on Crenshaw Blvd and in Leimert Park.

The video at the top is one report from KTLA Channel 5 from a reporter Steve Kuzj, who I was able to talk into interviewing me. I have been coming down to Leimert Park for many years during events and demonstrations and I have seen many reporters. Most of these reporters do recognize me but will not interview me or even ask my opinion.

Most of the interviews of Black Americans that I have seen in the network TV news are usually the dumbest or most waked-out Black Americans that they can find!
This young reporter did interview me for some time. He did broadcast just a little of what I said during this interview at the 6:30 pm news broadcast from Channel 5 news reports. This is the first time that I have ever been interviewed by any network TV station. I am the man in the video wearing the Blue Hawaiian shirt.

During my interview with Steve Kuzj, I stated that the Zimmerman verdict is the result of jury tampering by Zimmerman's father and jury misconduct. George Zimmerman, his father, his mother as well as others should be prosecuted for perjury.  I also stated  that the police officers who let Zimmerman go the night he killed Trayvon Martin should be in jail as well. I stated that Obama is just a "Front" for the Bush Family Regime and is only carrying out the Bush Family's  "Manifesto" of genocide against Black Americans by the use of a racist corrupt judicial system, immigration anarchy and "no protection under the law" for Black Americans!


This next video is what I recorded from the demonstration in Leimert Park on Crenshaw Blvd. It documents the heavy police presence at the park when there was only a small turn out of demonstrators. I was able to do a short interview with Steve Kuzj, the reporter that finally interviewed me for the Channel 5 News.

The media below is an episode of The Justice Channel on Blog Talk Radio that I host and produce,  of me commenting and discussing the George Zimmerman verdict.

Listen to internet radio with Ernest Moore on BlogTalkRadio

Saturday, September 8, 2012

The Law. Vs. The Law: Is Another Murder Taking Place Now in San Bernardino County?

Are judges above the law? 


At the DNC & RNC conventions, all of the politicians are acting like every thing is just dandy in the U.S. and that the problems with the economy and joblessness are not the result of run-away corruption in our government, judicial system and law enforcement. They especially make no mention of the decimation of the Black American population that is "under attack" by our government in this country!

The article below is a good example of the blatant corruption that is running "Hog Wild" in our judicial system and is being ignored by all of these smiley politicians.  

This article has been submitted by a Forein Correspondent for The Justice Channel, 
Janet Phelan.



Actually, in the doublespeak of conservatorship lingo, the conservator doesn’t actually “kill” or “murder” the conservatee. What she does is make an “end of life decision” for her ward.

Such a decision may involve the disallowal of medicine for a ward who is ill with a treatable disease. When Elizabeth Fairbanks fell ill with pneumonia, conservator Melodie Scott made an “end of life decision” and ordered the withholding of antibiotics and, just to give that little extra push into the grave, okayed that the elderly woman be dosed with morphine. Morphine retards respiration and may, in fact, stop a person's breathing.

Helpless and without legal standing to intervene, Fairbanks’ children watched in horror as their mother struggled to breathe, then stopped breathing forever.

Fairbanks’ last breath was drawn at a Braswell’s facility. The Braswell’s homes are scattered throughout San Bernardino County, and many of Melodie Scott’s wards have drawn their final breath at one of Braswell’s facilities.

After her attempt was derailed to anonymously admit conservatee Charlie Castle into San Gabriel Valley Medical Center (his whereabouts were discovered and a line of contact with him was established, thereby overriding the anonymity of the admit), Melodie Scott appears to have made one of those “special” decisions about where Charlie’s ride would end, and on August 5 she admitted him into Braswell’s Desert Manor in Yucca Valley.


Immediately, the first step in the “Isolate-Medicate-Euthanize” protocol was invoked. Charlie’s legal right to make and receive phone calls, guaranteed under C.F.R. 483.10 (k) and California Welfare and Institutions Code 5325 (d), was terminated “on the order of the conservator,” according to Megan at Braswell’s. In a case such as Charlie Castle’s, these phone calls may constitute a life-line.

A call was then made to San Bernardino Adult Protective Services and the screener, Tania, refused to take the report, stating that APS has no dominion over those in long-term care facilities.

A call to the San Bernardino County Ombudsman produced an immediate result. A woman who identified herself as Barbara took the report and within a couple of hours, someone from the Ombudsman’s office visited Desert Manor. However, according to the Social Services Director, Megan, the Ombudsman supported the decision of the facility to deny Charlie’s rights to make and receive phone calls.

Another effort to lodge a report with APS was then made and the supervisor, Tatiana Khokhold, stated that the report would not be investigated because Charlie is under a conservatorship. There is no law prohibiting APS from investigating these cases, however.

Ron Buttram, Deputy Director of the San Bernardino County Office on Aging, has declined to comment on either the behavior of the Ombudsman or the refusal of APS to investigate this report and has referred all calls to the Public Information officer, who is out of the office and will return next week.

Calls to the San Bernardino County Courthouse revealed that no one could reveal whether Charlie Castle’s writ of habeas corpus, filed last week, was granted or not. The reason for all this secrecy is that Charlie is under a mental health conservatorship and all this hush-hush business — it is all to protect his privacy. You can thank HIPPA for that perversion of rights and oversight.

In the Administration office of Braswell’s, Chris (who declined to provide his last name) waxed somewhat philosophical over the plight of Charlie Castle and others in his situation. “The facility must make difficult decisions in cases like this,” he said. He admitted awareness of the laws which guarantee the right to make and receive phone calls for residents at facilities like Desert Manor, but asked, “What do you do when a judge issues an order counter to the law?”

You follow the law, I replied.

“But the judge is the law,” said Chris.

Actually, the judge is a man in a long black robe who has taken an oath to uphold the law, but Chris would hear nothing concerning this perception and suddenly reversed his previous statements.

“We do not block a resident from making or receiving phone calls,” he announced cheerfully.

At day’s end, I turned on the tube and listened to Obama’s nomination acceptance speech at the DNC in Charlotte. Repeatedly, President Obama affirmed that we are a country where “everyone plays by the same rules,” as the crowd roared its approval.

He must not have heard about the way they are playing the game out in San Bernardino.



Janet Phelan
Activist Post
http://www.activistpost.com/2012/09/the-law-vs-law-is-another-murder-taking.html

Friday, September 7, 2012




Friday, September 7, 2012

Is This George Bush's Third Term?


 Both political parties have made it very clear that they are going to do more for Mexicans and Mexico than for Black Americans! Is it because they are Bush relatives? 
See the evidence below!


Federation for American Immigration Reform
Illegal Immigration Cheered at Democratic Convention; God Needs an Assist from Mayor Villaraigosa
One Wednesday evening during prime time, delegates to the Democratic National Convention were addressed by an illegal alien demanding passage of the DREAM Act amnesty.
Full Story

Will Democrats Deliver on Amnesty?
That's the question asked by Maria Pena in a Fox News Latino commentary.
Full Story

Support FAIR

California Sheriffs’ Association Opposes Anti-Detainer Legislation
Last week, the California Sheriffs' Association came out in opposition to the California Legislature's recent passage of anti-detainer bill, that would prohibit state and local law enforcement agents from honoring ICE detainers unless an alien has been convicted of or is in custody for a serious or violent felony.
Full Story

'Undocubus' Illegal Alien Protesters Released After DNC Protest
Immigration officials have decided not to detain 10 illegal immigrants who were arrested by police for blocking traffic.
Full Story

Former Senator Advises Mitt: The Public Can't Handle Immigration Discussion
This year's presidential candidates are taking a different approach to their campaigns: they’re going to avoid mentioning important yet sensitive topics that Americans can’t handle. Like immigration.
Full Story



FEDERATION FOR AMERICAN IMMIGRATION REFORM
Copyright © 2012. All rights reserved.
FAIR Video:
FAIR video

Find out the truth behind 'The Morton Memos'
Legislative Update
immigration reform blog
Morton Memos
Visit the best immigration
news blog on the web...

Donate to FAIR
FAIR is a member of the
Better Business Bureau
Wise Giving Alliance

and has been awarded
four out of four stars by
Charity Navigator.



This message was sent to tjc@corbettstudios.com from:
Federation for American Immigration Reform | 25 Massachusetts Ave. NW #330 | Washington, DC 20001
Email Marketing by iContact - Try It Free!
Manage Your Subscription  |  Forward This Message